DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volvo XC60 vs 2015 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChevrolet
XC60ModelCaptiva
2014Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
200 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
181 HPPower184 HP
420 NmTorque400 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4673 mm
1891 mmWidth1849 mm
1713 mmHeight1756 mm
1816-1935 KgWeight—
2774 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volvo XC60 and 2015 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…