DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2014 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeVolvo
CaptivaModelXC60
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
192 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2231 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
184 HPPower181 HP
400 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
10 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/70 R16; 235/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4644 mm
1849 mmWidth1891 mm
1756 mmHeight1713 mm
—Weight1816-1935 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Chevrolet Captiva and 2014 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…