DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC60 vs 2016 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
XC60ModelPassat
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
210 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
306 HPPower280 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8Gears6 DSG
—Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4767 mm
1891 mmWidth1832 mm
1713 mmHeight1456 mm
1816-1935 KgWeight1540 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC60 and 2016 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…