DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
MeganeModelXC60
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
255 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
273 HPPower306 HP
360 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,5 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears8
225/40 R18; 235/35 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4644 mm
1848 mmWidth1891 mm
1435 mmHeight1713 mm
1379 KgWeight1816-1935 Kg
2636 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…