DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC60 vs 2016 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
XC60ModelMegane
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
210 km/hTop speed255 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
306 HPPower273 HP
400 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size225/40 R18; 235/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4299 mm
1891 mmWidth1848 mm
1713 mmHeight1435 mm
1816-1935 KgWeight1379 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2636 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC60 and 2016 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…