2017 • Volvo
XC60
Volvo XC60 2.0 T5 (250 Hp) 2017Overall Score80.75/100
2017 Volvo XC60 vs 2018 MG HS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2018 • MG
HS
MG HS 2.0 (231 Hp) 2018Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
MG HS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Performance
Volvo XC60SpecificationMG HS
6,9 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
250 HPPower231 HP
350 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC60SpecificationMG HS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo XC60SpecificationMG HS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6 DCT
235/60 R18Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo XC60SpecificationMG HS
4688 mmLength4574 mm
1902 mmWidth1876 mm
1658 mmHeight1664 mm
1852 KgWeight1630 Kg
2865 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Volvo XC60 and 2018 MG HS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG HS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Image unavailableVSImage unavailableLexus GS vs Volvo XC602017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableBorgward BX7 vs Volvo XC602017 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableKTM X-Bow vs Volvo XC602016 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMG HS vs Volvo XC602018 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableBorgward BX6 vs Volvo XC602016 and 2017 model years
Comments are loading…