DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 KTM X-Bow vs 2017 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC60
KTMMakeVolvo
X-BowModelXC60
2016Model year2017
RoadsterBody typeSUV
2Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC60
3,9 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
220 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
240 HPPower250 HP
310 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC60
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears8
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size235/60 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationVolvo XC60
3738 mmLength4688 mm
1915 mmWidth1902 mm
1202 mmHeight1658 mm
790 KgWeight1852 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2865 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 KTM X-Bow and 2017 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…