DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volvo XC60 vs 2016 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC60SpecificationKTM X-Bow
VolvoMakeKTM
XC60ModelX-Bow
2017Model year2016
SUVBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors—

Performance

Volvo XC60SpecificationKTM X-Bow
6,9 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
210 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
250 HPPower240 HP
350 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC60SpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC60SpecificationKTM X-Bow
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
235/60 R18Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Volvo XC60SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4688 mmLength3738 mm
1902 mmWidth1915 mm
1658 mmHeight1202 mm
1852 KgWeight790 Kg
2865 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volvo XC60 and 2016 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…