DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC60 vs 2012 Audi Q3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi Q3
VolvoMakeAudi
XC60ModelQ3
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi Q3
8,1 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
210 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower170 HP
320 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi Q3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi Q3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi Q3
4627 mmLength4385 mm
1891 mmWidth1831 mm
1713 mmHeight1608 mm
1698 KgWeight1585 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2603 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC60 and 2012 Audi Q3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…