DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi A3 vs 2012 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo XC60
AudiMakeVolvo
A3ModelXC60
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo XC60
7,1 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
232 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
180 HPPower240 HP
250 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo XC60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo XC60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationVolvo XC60
4237 mmLength4627 mm
1777 mmWidth1891 mm
1421 mmHeight1713 mm
1230 KgWeight1698 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi A3 and 2012 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…