DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo XC60 vs 2012 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A3
VolvoMakeAudi
XC60ModelA3
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A3
8,1 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
210 km/hTop speed232 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
240 HPPower180 HP
320 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A3
4627 mmLength4237 mm
1891 mmWidth1777 mm
1713 mmHeight1421 mm
1698 KgWeight1230 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo XC60 and 2012 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…