DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo XC60 vs 2013 SsangYong Rexton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSsangYong
XC60ModelRexton
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
181 HPPower155 HP
400 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/75 R16; 255/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4755 mm
1891 mmWidth1900 mm
1713 mmHeight1785-1840 mm
1816-1935 KgWeight1901-1965 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo XC60 and 2013 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…