DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 SsangYong Rexton vs 2013 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeVolvo
RextonModelXC60
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
173 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
155 HPPower181 HP
360 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
78 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/75 R16; 255/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4755 mmLength4644 mm
1900 mmWidth1891 mm
1785-1840 mmHeight1713 mm
1901-1965 KgWeight1816-1935 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 SsangYong Rexton and 2013 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…