DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC60 vs 2016 SsangYong Rexton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSsangYong
XC60ModelRexton
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower155 HP
400 NmTorque360 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank78 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionAT
—Tyre size18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4755 mm
1891 mmWidth1900 mm
1713 mmHeight1840 mm
1843 KgWeight1925 kg
—Luggage capacity250 lt
2774 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Volvo XC60

No additional feature records are available.

SsangYong RextonDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC60 and 2016 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…