2016 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 Power 2016 2.0 165 HPOverall Score72.5/100
2016 Mazda 6 vs 2016 Volvo XC60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volvo
XC60
Volvo XC60 2.0 D4 (163 Hp) 2016Overall Score72.75/100
WINNER
Volvo XC60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC60
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelXC60
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC60
10,1 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
209 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
165 HPPower163 HP
210 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo XC60
4870 mmLength4644 mm
1840 mmWidth1891 mm
1450 mmHeight1713 mm
1340 kgWeight1843 Kg
480 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2774 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda 6 and 2016 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…