DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC60 vs 2012 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

72.75–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A6
VolvoMakeAudi
XC60ModelA6
2016Model year2012
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A6
10,3 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
200 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
163 HPPower136 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A6
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC60SpecificationAudi A6
4644 mmLength4926 mm
1891 mmWidth1874 mm
1713 mmHeight1461 mm
1843 KgWeight1715 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2912 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC60 and 2012 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…