DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo XC60 vs 2016 Mini Countryman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMini
XC60ModelCountryman
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
350 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption5,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R17 91V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4109 mm
1891 mmWidth1789 mm
1713 mmHeight1561 mm
1834-1921 KgWeight1320 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo XC60 and 2016 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…