DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Countryman vs 2016 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeVolvo
CountrymanModelXC60
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
305 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R17 91VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4109 mmLength4644 mm
1789 mmWidth1891 mm
1561 mmHeight1713 mm
1320 KgWeight1834-1921 Kg
2596 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Countryman and 2016 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…