DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Volvo V90 vs 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
V90ModelChallenger
1998Model year1998
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2922 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
204 HPPower185 HP
267 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
11 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
—Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4530 mm
—Width1775 mm
—Height1730 mm
—Weight1830 Kg
—Wheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Volvo V90 and 1998 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…