DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 1998 Volvo V90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
ChallengerModelV90
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,1 s
170 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
185 HPPower204 HP
265 NmTorque267 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank80 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
265/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength—
1775 mmWidth—
1730 mmHeight—
1830 KgWeight—
2725 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mitsubishi Challenger and 1998 Volvo V90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…