DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V70 vs 2013 Cadillac ATS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeCadillac
V70ModelATS
2012Model year2013
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
205 HPPower205 HP
420 NmTorque259 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6 Hydra-Matic
—Tyre size225/45 R17; 225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4823 mmLength4643 mm
—Width1805 mm
1547 mmHeight1421 mm
1806 KgWeight1505 Kg
2816 mmWheelbase2775 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V70 and 2013 Cadillac ATS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…