2003 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 2.0 T (180 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Volvo V70 vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Volvo V70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V70SpecificationFord C-Max
VolvoMakeFord
V70ModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V70SpecificationFord C-Max
9,1 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
180 HPPower136 HP
240 NmTorque320 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V70SpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V70SpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V70SpecificationFord C-Max
4710 mmLength4330 mm
1804 mmWidth1820 mm
1465 mmHeight1600 mm
1490 KgWeight1391 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volvo V70 and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…