DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Volvo V70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V70
FordMakeVolvo
C-MaxModelV70
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V70
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
136 HPPower180 HP
320 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V70
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo V70
4330 mmLength4710 mm
1820 mmWidth1804 mm
1600 mmHeight1465 mm
1391 KgWeight1490 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2755 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…