1996 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 2.0 (126 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
1996 Volvo V70 vs 1996 Chrysler Neon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 2.0 i 16V (147 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V70SpecificationChrysler Neon
VolvoMakeChrysler
V70ModelNeon
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V70SpecificationChrysler Neon
11,9 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
126 HPPower147 HP
170 NmTorque174 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V70SpecificationChrysler Neon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank42 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V70SpecificationChrysler Neon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V70SpecificationChrysler Neon
4730 mmLength4364 mm
1760 mmWidth1714 mm
1430 mmHeight1369 mm
1470 KgWeight—
2660 mmWheelbase2642 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Volvo V70 and 1996 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…