1996 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 2.0 i 16V (147 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
1996 Chrysler Neon vs 1996 Volvo V70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 2.0 (126 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V70
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chrysler NeonSpecificationVolvo V70
ChryslerMakeVolvo
NeonModelV70
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Chrysler NeonSpecificationVolvo V70
8,8 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
147 HPPower126 HP
174 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Chrysler NeonSpecificationVolvo V70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption13,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Chrysler NeonSpecificationVolvo V70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chrysler NeonSpecificationVolvo V70
4364 mmLength4730 mm
1714 mmWidth1760 mm
1369 mmHeight1430 mm
—Weight1470 Kg
2642 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Chrysler Neon and 1996 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…