DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo V70 vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeOpel
V70ModelCascada
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
215 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
180 HPPower200 HP
320 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4823 mmLength4696 mm
—Width1839 mm
1547 mmHeight1443 mm
1567 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2816 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo V70 and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…