2013 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 1.6 (200 Hp) 2013Overall Score71.5/100
2013 Opel Cascada vs 2013 Volvo V70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 1.6 T4 (180 Hp) 2013Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Opel Cascada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CascadaSpecificationVolvo V70
OpelMakeVolvo
CascadaModelV70
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Opel CascadaSpecificationVolvo V70
9,2 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
235 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
200 HPPower180 HP
280 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CascadaSpecificationVolvo V70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel CascadaSpecificationVolvo V70
4696 mmLength4823 mm
1839 mmWidth—
1443 mmHeight1547 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1567 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2816 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Opel Cascada and 2013 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…