DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo V70 vs 2013 Mini Paceman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Paceman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMini
V70ModelPaceman
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
215 km/hTop speed226 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
180 HPPower218 HP
320 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/45 R18 91V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4823 mmLength4124 mm
—Width1786 mm
1547 mmHeight1527 mm
1567 KgWeight1400 Kg
2816 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo V70 and 2013 Mini Paceman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Paceman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…