DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volvo V60 vs 2013 Cadillac ATS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeCadillac
V60ModelATS
2014Model year2013
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
215 HPPower205 HP
640 NmTorque259 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Diesel / ElectricFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
1,8 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears6 Hydra-Matic
—Tyre size225/45 R17; 225/40 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4643 mm
1899 mmWidth1805 mm
1484 mmHeight1421 mm
2058 KgWeight1505 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2775 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volvo V60 and 2013 Cadillac ATS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…