DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Caterham CSR vs 2014 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

77.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeVolvo
CSRModelV60
2014Model year2014
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

3,7 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
225 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
200 HPPower215 HP
221 NmTorque640 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Diesel / Electric
42 ltFuel tank45 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,5 ltAverage consumption1,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
195/45R15; 255/40 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

3300 mmLength4635 mm
1685 mmWidth1899 mm
1140 mmHeight1484 mm
565 KgWeight2058 Kg
2315 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Caterham CSR and 2014 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…