DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeToyota
V50ModelHighlander
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2362 cc
170 HPPower157 HP
230 NmTorque221 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4685 mm
1845 mmWidth1825 mm
1457 mmHeight1735 mm
1483 KgWeight1580 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…