DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeNissan
V50ModelX-Trail
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
205 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
140 HPPower165 HP
220 NmTorque230 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4514 mmLength4455 mm
1770 mmWidth1765 mm
1452 mmHeight1675 mm
1452 KgWeight1470 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…