DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan X-Trail vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
X-TrailModelV50
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
191 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
165 HPPower140 HP
230 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4455 mmLength4514 mm
1765 mmWidth1770 mm
1675 mmHeight1452 mm
1470 KgWeight1452 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan X-Trail and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…