DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo V50 vs 2008 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
VolvoMakeSaab
V50Model9-3
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
9,6 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
136 HPPower125 HP
320 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
4522 mmLength4635 mm
1845 mmWidth1762 mm
1457 mmHeight1466 mm
1472 KgWeight1610 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo V50 and 2008 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…