DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Ford Kuga vs 2008 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo V50
FordMakeVolvo
KugaModelV50
2008Model year2008
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo V50
10,6 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
320 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo V50
DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank52 lt
8 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo V50
4443 mmLength4522 mm
1832 mmWidth1845 mm
1677 mmHeight1457 mm
2100 KgWeight1472 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Ford Kuga and 2008 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…