DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo V50 vs 2008 Mazda 5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
VolvoMakeMazda
V50Model5
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
9,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower143 HP
320 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 5
4522 mmLength4505 mm
1845 mmWidth1755 mm
1457 mmHeight1665 mm
1472 KgWeight1535 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo V50 and 2008 Mazda 5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…