DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo V50 vs 2008 Great Wall SUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall SUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeGreat Wall
V50ModelSUV
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
136 HPPower105 HP
320 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
YesABS—

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4860 mm
1845 mmWidth1725 mm
1457 mmHeight1820 mm
1472 KgWeight1760 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo V50 and 2008 Great Wall SUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall SUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…