2008 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2008Overall Score61.75/100
2008 Volvo V50 vs 2008 Great Wall RUV Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Great Wall
RUV
Great Wall RUV 2.2 2WD (105 Hp) 2008Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Great Wall RUV
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationGreat Wall RUV
VolvoMakeGreat Wall
V50ModelRUV
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5-7
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationGreat Wall RUV
9,6 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
136 HPPower105 HP
320 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationGreat Wall RUV
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationGreat Wall RUV
4522 mmLength5105 mm
1845 mmWidth1785 mm
1457 mmHeight1870 mm
1472 KgWeight1670 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase3025 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Volvo V50 and 2008 Great Wall RUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall RUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…