DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo V50 vs 2008 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationFord Kuga
VolvoMakeFord
V50ModelKuga
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationFord Kuga
9,6 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
320 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption8 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationFord Kuga
4522 mmLength4443 mm
1845 mmWidth1832 mm
1457 mmHeight1677 mm
1472 KgWeight2100 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo V50 and 2008 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…