2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2004Overall Score58.75/100
2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Mitsubishi Airtrek Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mitsubishi
Airtrek
Mitsubishi Airtrek 2.0 (126 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Airtrek
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
V50ModelAirtrek
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
9,6 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower126 HP
320 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
4522 mmLength4410 mm
1845 mmWidth1750 mm
1457 mmHeight1550 mm
1472 KgWeight1330 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2626 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Mitsubishi Airtrek approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Airtrek leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…