DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 6 vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelV50
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
10,7 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
310 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16 HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
4700 mmLength4522 mm
1780 mmWidth1845 mm
1480 mmHeight1457 mm
1465 KgWeight1472 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 6 and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…