DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 MG ZT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMG ZT
VolvoMakeMG
V50ModelZT
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMG ZT
9,6 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1951 cc
136 HPPower131 HP
320 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMG ZT
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMG ZT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMG ZT
4522 mmLength4740 mm
1845 mmWidth1780 mm
1457 mmHeight1410 mm
1472 KgWeight1535 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2746 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 MG ZT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…