2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2004Overall Score58.75/100
2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Mazda Roadster Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mazda
Roadster
Mazda Roadster 1.8 i (146 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Roadster
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda Roadster
VolvoMakeMazda
V50ModelRoadster
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda Roadster
9,6 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
136 HPPower146 HP
320 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda Roadster
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank48 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda Roadster
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda Roadster
4522 mmLength3955 mm
1845 mmWidth1680 mm
1457 mmHeight1235 mm
1472 KgWeight1010 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2265 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…