DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
V50Model6
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
9,6 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
320 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
4522 mmLength4700 mm
1845 mmWidth1780 mm
1457 mmHeight1480 mm
1472 KgWeight1465 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…