DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Alfa Romeo GT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeAlfa Romeo
V50ModelGT
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
320 NmTorque163 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank63 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4480 mm
1845 mmWidth1760 mm
1457 mmHeight1390 mm
1472 KgWeight1300 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Alfa Romeo GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…