2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2004Overall Score58.75/100
2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Citroen Xsara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 2.0 16V (136 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Citroen Xsara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen Xsara
VolvoMakeCitroen
V50ModelXsara
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen Xsara
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower136 HP
320 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen Xsara
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank54 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen Xsara
4522 mmLength4167 mm
1845 mmWidth1698 mm
1457 mmHeight1401 mm
1472 KgWeight1175 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…