2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2004Overall Score58.75/100
2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Chrysler Neon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 2.0 16V (133 Hp) 2004Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Chrysler Neon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
58.75–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationChrysler Neon
VolvoMakeChrysler
V50ModelNeon
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationChrysler Neon
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
136 HPPower133 HP
320 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationChrysler Neon
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank47 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationChrysler Neon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationChrysler Neon
4522 mmLength4390 mm
1845 mmWidth1715 mm
1457 mmHeight1421 mm
1472 KgWeight1245 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2667 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler Neon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…