DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Ford Mondeo vs 2009 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolvo
MondeoModelV50
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
110 HPPower125 HP
138 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4778 mmLength4522 mm
1886 mmWidth1845 mm
1500 mmHeight1457 mm
1477 KgWeight1383 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Ford Mondeo and 2009 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…