2010 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 1.6 i 16V (101 Hp) 2010Overall Score57.25/100
2010 Volvo V50 vs 2010 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.6 Multijet (90 Hp) 2010Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V50
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationFiat Bravo
VolvoMakeFiat
V50ModelBravo
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationFiat Bravo
12,0 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
185 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank57 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationFiat Bravo
4514 mmLength4336 mm
1770 mmWidth1792 mm
1452 mmHeight1498 mm
1260 KgWeight1320 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Volvo V50 and 2010 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…