2010 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.6 Multijet (90 Hp) 2010Overall Score56.25/100
2010 Fiat Bravo vs 2010 Volvo V50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 1.6 i 16V (101 Hp) 2010Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V50
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V50
FiatMakeVolvo
BravoModelV50
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V50
12,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
173 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
90 HPPower101 HP
290 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V50
DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank62 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V50
4336 mmLength4514 mm
1792 mmWidth1770 mm
1498 mmHeight1452 mm
1320 KgWeight1260 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Fiat Bravo and 2010 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…